Letter on Iraq, 11-16-98

Dear fellow librarians,

Presidential spokespersons officially announced that 10,0000 Iraqis were to
die in a massive US armed attack unleashed against the people
of the nation of Iraq as punishment for its governments "non-compliance"
with US/UN weapons inspections there. The horror  of this action was
narrowly averted, we are told. This kind of threat, the open threat to kill
civilians by the thousands to punish a dictator and his cabal for their
alleged evasions of international inspectors looking for hidden weapons
caches, is state terrorism and it makes a mockery of international law and
the rational pursuit of a peace and security.

The kind of free, democratic culture to which we, as librarians, hope we
are contributing cannot abide our government  brandishing the threat of
such  a mass slaughter, of such calculated technological barbarism, as a
legitimate tool to force the compliance of another government to our will.
Democratic librarians who see global peace and security and justice as the
foundations for the advancement of the cultural and educational projects
which are our special professional responsibilities must make their voices
heard along with those from all walks of life who decry the threat of
bloody mass murder as a legitimate instrument of diplomacy.

The US cannot continue to play this kind of brinksmanship with the threats
of unleashing unspeakable devastation. We already have hobbled Iraq with
sanctions which have had disatrous consequences for the common people of
the nation. This itself is abominable. It is, however, truly degrading to
the moral foundations of our own democratic republic to resort to escalating
threats of mass butchery at every impasse to our will and in so doing to 
create a state of permanent anxiety of imminent war, here in this country as 
around the world, in order to deal with an irresponsible and recalcitrant 
government in Iraq which challenges our right to infringe what they believe to 
be their nation's sovereignty.

The press asks "who blinked?" to assess the relative advantage of Iraq
versus the United States after a bloodbath was narrowly averted. The
question is "Who wouldn't blink in horror at the brink of the planned
prospect of the death of at least 10,000 persons and the devastation of
their country?"

Democratic, progressive librarians say "NO to US threats of mass
destruction and death against the people of Iraq! End the sanctions against
the people of Iraq! Books not bombs!"

Prof. Mark C. Rosenzweig
ALA Councilor at large
co-cordinator, Progressive Librarians Guild


Elaine Harger, Progressive Librarians Guild
Donna Mandel, MLIS student, San Jose State University
Sam Trosow, PhD student (information policy), UCLA
Mark Scheu
Sanford Berman, Hennepin County Library, Minnetonka, MN
Roberta Frye, Oakland
Deborah A. Richards, Simmons College
Linda Lopez-Otero, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Rory Litwin, MLIS student, San Jose State University
Suzanne Tronier, Salt Lake County Library System
Peter McDonald Peter McDonald, Geneva Library, Cornell U., Geneva NY
Felipe Meneses Tello, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Katia Roberto, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Charles Willett, CRISES Press
Miriam Pickens, Student, Wayne State Univ. LISP
Jos Anemaet, Oregon State University
Phil Runkel, Catholic Worker Archivist, Marquette University Archives
Carol Liu, New York City
Sarah Springer, MLIS student, University of Pittsburgh
Derek Monypeny, Librarian, Oakland, CA
Christa Gush, David Gomez & Associates
Jessamyn West, Shoreline Community College
Aimee J. Camp, Pueblo Library District, Pueblo Colorado
Carolyn Riddle, University of Arizona, MLIS student
Amanda R. Calvert, University of Arizona, Tucson

Back to Librarians Against War